Why is bringing new life into the game

Why is bringing new life into the game, and allowing older players a chance to play a class that they had written off because of the time sink, a bad thing?
wow gold fr
All that this means is that there will be more people for PVP, Dungeons and RAIDS. That is the only impact that this will have on the game. The impact it has on your butt hurt is of no consequence.

If my options were to either

I would argue that the whole "Ordos" thing about ganking your own faction is plenty fun, don't lie to yourself.

You can't just take the reason you find something fun and apply it to everyone...doesn't work. If my options were to either
or world of Warcraft
1. wait 10 minutes to fight the alliance in a random BG

or

2. fight anyone and wait for 2-3 minutes...

#2 by a landslide. I don't even bother queing at this point because the wait can be so bad. What is the opportunity cost of keeping this rigid A vs H alive?

There are a lot of things that lead to variations

There are a lot of things that lead to variations between classes - some shine in some situations, others shine in others. Thok, for example - the interrupt mechanic is less of a bother for some specs than others, but that's just one fight, so it's not a huge deal. There are specs that are better or worse on Blackfuse's belt, specs that are great for dealing with Engineers on Garrosh and specs that are bad at it, and so on and so on.
po world of Warcraft
All of that is well and good, and should be preserved.

However, movement is not a niche. It comes up on most every fight. Being able to deal with momvent is as essential a part of the toolkit as AoE. If some specs can do it and others can't, it's not that you just adjust for one fight - it's something you have to adjust for over the long term, because it's going to come up again and again.

If they put much less movement in fights, that would also work -- but that would also lead to a more boring game.

In reality it does seem kinda of pointless to remove them

In reality it does seem kinda of pointless to remove them.

you can always use the scale down technology to keep them competitive.
world of Warcraft po
Also.. the fact you have to rely on crap like invisibility potions.. kinda makes them /derp

Why couldn't you remove stuff like Timeless Isle

token of good will and customer appreciation

nvm. Armory just hasn't updated, as usual. I'm all good! Thanks Ry.

e: But if you're actually giving away a mount as a conciliatory gesture, as a token of good will and customer appreciation, I'll take one, any one - I'm at 199 mounts for the achievement! Old raid and dungeon mounts have refused to drop for over 8 years (unless I don't know it's there). I could buy that big fat yak but 100k...eep. Wait, I think I'm missing that other golden lotus chicken...k, nvm again.world of Warcraft po

e2: Well pooh, achievement said 199, bought the crane and still says 199. It's rigged!!

/grumble - back to mount drop runs

e3: logged on to a char with a class mount and got my achievement. So all done for now. Hope Warlords has a new achievement! Thanks again.

I appreciate you're not outright dismissing

I appreciate you're not outright dismissing it and that it's not as simple as rolling back the clocks :)
World of Warcraft Gold
That said however this 'something new' is something quite scary to me. Out of all the new battlegrounds, I think I enjoy Twin Peaks and at a stretch Temple of Kotmogu if played rarely. Do we really need new battlegrounds when the ones we have right now aren't as fun as they could be? When they need work? In my opinion, no, we don't need any more 10 minute maps that aren't even enjoyable.

I've never once seen anyone asking to bring back Zul'Gurub, Zul'Aman, Scholomance, Deadmines or any of the revamped dungeons or raids. Those still happened. Whether for better or for worse that's not for me to decide, but again never seen someone asking to bring those back.

You're missing the point

You're missing the point, by confusing complex with complicated, and deep with numerous. It's possible to make the game more deep and complex, while, or by, removing surface numerousness. Complexity has much more to do with the balance and relationship between the extant choices, than it does with the simple number of said choices.or wow At some point, as you increase that number, the added difficulty in balancing between the larger number of choices is likely to decrease the resultant complexity. You're looking for that sweet spot, where you have chess, and not tic tac toe on the 'fewer relevant choices' side, or some overly complicated WW2 simulation board game on the "too many choices and rules" side, either of which is much more shallow than chess, despite one being simpler and one being more complicated.

my pally did SoO LFR first boss

RNG....my pally did SoO LFR first boss to last boss once and got 4 tier tokens. On top of that the celestial kill the next tuesday dropped both tier pieces. Done with this toon.
wow po
RNG...my hunter queues for SoO LFR first time. Second boss drops the bow.

I guess they knew I wouldn't run that content again on these toons.

RNg...third Huolon kill dropped the mount.

I know people who haven't even seen any of these drops running the content since start of 5.4. It's no fun to be dependant on luck.